Which best describes the difference of opinion over the annexation of Hawaii?

Supporters argued that annexation would benefit the United States through access to Hawaii’s strategic location and resources, and that it could benefit Hawaii as well. Opponents, including President Grover Cleveland, argued that the overthrow of Queen Liliʻuokalani and the attempt to annex Hawaii were unjust and illegal. Therefore, the best choice is “Some leaders felt annexation would benefit both countries, while others argued it was illegal.”

AI-written and checked against the verified answer.