AnswersRVACR EcologyAnalyzing Data and Drawing Conclusions

Analyzing Data and Drawing Conclusions Answers

8 verified answers1 views
2
Free Preview

What was the scientist’s conclusion?

A
The hypothesis is supported because the processed forms of juice have lower amounts of vitamin C than the fresh juice.
B
The hypothesis is not supported because the processed forms of juice have greater amounts of vitamin C than the fresh juice.
4

Which statement is most likely Megan’s conclusion?

A
The hypothesis is supported because the most common blood type in the United States is AB+.
B
The hypothesis is not supported because the most common blood type in the United States is O+.
6

What did the microbiologist conclude?

A
The hypothesis is supported because on average S. aureus was more susceptible to antibiotics than E. coli.
B
The hypothesis is not supported because on average S. aureus was less susceptible to antibiotics than E. coli.
7

How did plant growth in the pH 3.1 group compare to plant growth in the other groups?The plants in the pH 3.1 group grew faster.The plants in the pH 3.1 group grew slower.The plants in each group grew at the same rate.✔ The plants in the pH 3.1 group died after six days.

A
The plants in the pH 3.1 group grew faster.
B
The plants in the pH 3.1 group grew slower.
C
The plants in each group grew at the same rate.
D
✔ The plants in the pH 3.1 group died after six days.
8

Which statement is the most likely conclusion reached by the agronomist?

A
The hypothesis is supported because the plants exposed to the most acidic pH, pH 3.1, died after six days.
B
The hypothesis is not supported because all of the plants grew at the same rate.

Did you find these answers helpful?