AnswersFL-1001340-English 2 Sem 1 - FlexSugar Changed the World, Part 5: Developing and Refining Ideas

Analyzing Satire in Fiction Answers

1 verified answers1 views
1
Free Preview

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World.Mohandas K. Gandhi (later known as the Mahatma or Great One) was born in India to a traditional Hindu family. When he was given the opportunity to study law in England, he faced the same problem as the indentured sugar workers: He would lose caste if he crossed the black water. His family arranged a special ceremony that allowed him to make the trip without giving up his place in society. Thus, in 1894, freshly educated in England, Gandhi made a second journey. He began practicing law in Natal, a region in what is now South Africa. He moved there because many Indians were already in Natal, laboring as indentured sugar workers.One day, Gandhi later explained, "a man in tattered clothes, headgear in hand, two front teeth broken and his mouth bleeding, stood before me trembling and weeping." The indentured worker, whose name was Balasumdaram, had been badly beaten by his employer. Gandhi knew that Balasumdaram was trapped. For no matter how poorly he had been treated by his boss, if he left the plantation, he could be prosecuted and jailed. Gandhi saw indenture for what it was: "almost as bad as slavery. Like the slave the indentured labourer was the property of his master."

A
The evidence explains that Gandhi would lose caste if he traveled across the black water.
B
The evidence indicates that Gandhi wanted to live where he could interact with sugar workers.
C
The evidence shows that Gandhi felt sorry for a man who approached him weeping.
D
The evidence details how Gandhi saw a man who had been beaten and knew that the man could not leave.
2
Free Preview

What did you include in your response? Check all that apply.

A
a description of the type of evidence
B
an explanation of how the evidence supports the claim
C
an overall evaluation of the evidence
3

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World.A fire was lit in a giant iron cauldron, and the certificates of 2,300 Indians were tossed into the flames—the first major act of Satyagraha. "I am not property," the Indians were showing. "I am not your victim," they were demonstrating. "I have the power of my conscience," they were proving. The quiet strength of the Indian community shook the South African government. And by June 1914 it gave in; the Black Act was taken off the books. The Indians had insisted that they were not mere workers but were citizens—and finally the government could not resist.

A
The Indians' demonstration and act of resistance was a successful strategy to change laws.
B
South African leaders repealed the Black Act because they agreed with the Indians.
C
The Indians tossed their certificates into a cauldron to hide their legal status as property.
D
Satyagraha had more powerful political influence over laws than the government did.
4

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World.Underneath the clash over rights, laws, and work rules, there was a deeper truth that the planters were sensing: The Age of Sugar was ending. On the one hand, the work on the plantations was now guided by a web of laws and rules that even an Indian coolie like Bechu could use to challenge the owners. Workers were individuals, not property. On the other hand, world sugar prices were plummeting. Owners no longer had the economic clout of being a mainstay of the economy. Instead, smaller plantations were going bankrupt. The old ways were simply not working anymore. Why were sugar prices falling? Because of competition from another part of the world.

A
empirical evidence showing that sugar prices were plummeting all over the world.
B
logical evidence showing that sugar farming was changing because of laws and low prices.
C
ethical evidence showing that the drop in sugar prices was forcing smaller plantations to go bankrupt.
D
anecdotal evidence showing that smaller plantations were losing money and going bankrupt.
5

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World.The arkatis (recruiters) who were hired by shipping companies were Indians themselves; they knew villagers would not want to cross the water. But they also knew where there were hungry, desperate people. So they fanned out to the countryside and began to look for strong men. Bharath, who was about to leave for Trinidad, later explained how that happened. His version of English is hard to understand, but it is how the Indians began to speak on the islands. "E no tell e I go chinedad you know . . . e no tell e no come back, e no greet mumma fadder again." ("He did not tell me I was going to Trinidad, you know. He didn't tell me I would never come back, or never see my mother and father again.")

A
the goal of entertaining readers with stories about Indians going to the islands
B
the goal of explaining to readers how Indians were taken advantage of
C
the goal of describing to readers how the sugar industry recruiters were hired
D
the goal of convincing readers that Indians willingly went to the islands to work
6

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World.The Indian coolies and the ex-slaves, who resented these newcomers flooding into the colonies and driving down wages, were instant rivals. This was convenient for the planters—who were skilled at the game of divide and rule. The planters lumped their workers into two distinct but equally nasty stereotypes: Former slaves were described as lazy, whereas Indians were called meek, docile children. "You may have work and plenty of it for a black man and a coloured man, and they will not do it,” claimed planter W. Alleyne Ireland. He conveniently ignored the fact that the ex-slaves wanted to work their own land, not labor for their former owners. The overseers praised the Indians' meekness but also held them in contempt. The Indian, one overseer claimed, "possesses the low, cringing and abject habit common to his nationality."

A
anecdotal evidence that Indian workers and formerly enslaved people were paid wages on different scales
B
empirical evidence that planters ignored the fact that formerly enslaved people wanted to work their own land
C
empirical evidence that planters tried to pit formerly enslaved people against Indian workers to the planters’ advantage
D
logical evidence that Indian workers and formerly enslaved people did not get along with one another because wages went down
7

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World.On the day the coolies were to depart, each one was given a "tin ticket,” an identification disk, hung around the neck or strapped to the arm. The enslaved Africans who were taken to the sugar plantations lost their names; they were meant to be pure property. The Indian indentures were lied to, they were tricked, they were no more than cheap labor to keep the plantations running—but they were still individuals. Each of their names was carefully recorded in account books.

A
There was no difference between enslaved Africans and Indian indentures.
B
Indians retained some of their individuality by being able to keep their names.
C
Cheap labor was necessary to keep the sugar plantations running smoothly.
D
The tin ticket identification disk was recorded in account books to identify people.
8

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World.Workers could not leave the plantation unless they had a pass. And if they did decide to explore on their own, without permission, they could be thrown in jail, sentenced to hard labor, or lose some of their hard-earned wages. A charge of "idling" in the fields could result in the loss of a whole week's wages. Worse, if they dared rebel or protest, their contract could be transferred to another estate. And there were still complaints of flogging or mysterious deaths. Life, as the historian Hugh Tinker noted, was like being a prisoner on parole.

A
Who was Hugh Tinker, and what did he study?
B
What did the Indians’ contracts specify?
C
What was life actually like for indentured Indians?
D
What kind of work did the Indians do on plantations?
9

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World.Sugar turned human beings into property, yet sugar led people to reject the idea that any person could be owned by another. Sugar murdered millions, and yet it gave the voiceless a way to speak. Sugar crushed people, and yet it was because of sugar that Gandhi began his experiment in truth—so that every individual could free him- or herself. Only sugar—the sweetness we all crave—could drive people to be so cruel, and to combat all forms of cruelty. The craving for sugar took us from that ancient time when people were defined by the work of their ancestors to our modern world—the one Gandhi led us to see, in which each individual is valued as human. Though terrible conditions for sugar workers still exist in places such as the Dominican Republic, and cane sugar has been replaced by other sweeteners invented in the Age of Science, this one substance forever marked our history.

A
Cruel working conditions on sugar plantations caused many people to violently revolt and rebel.
B
Sugar has been a source of cruelty, from the time of plantations to modern farms.
C
Sugar plantations were violent systems, but sugar also led some people to reject slavery.
D
Sugar workers should reject the idea that anyone owns them and should combat cruelty.
10

What is an author's claim?

A
an author's primary reason for writing a text
B
a belief that is easily proved to be correct
C
an opinion or viewpoint in a persuasive text
D
a judgement of something based on a set of standards
11

Which pieces of evidence are most likely empirical? Select two options.quotations from planters describing formerly enslaved people and Indian workersstories about rivalries between formerly enslaved people and Indian workersa historical study showing that Indian workers were paid low wagesrecorded conversations with families whose ancestors experienced rivalriesresearch showing that planters encouraged rivalry between workers

A
quotations from planters describing formerly enslaved people and Indian workers
B
stories about rivalries between formerly enslaved people and Indian workers
C
a historical study showing that Indian workers were paid low wages
D
recorded conversations with families whose ancestors experienced rivalries
E
research showing that planters encouraged rivalry between workers

Did you find these answers helpful?