The Reagan Revolution

Question 1

In his 1991 book, Oliver L. North claims that Reagan knew about the use of residuals for the Contras. Which fact from "The Iran-Contra Affair” makes North’s claim more credible?

Revolt · Accepted Answer

North diverted funds, with the full knowledge of Reagan’s national security advisor.

Question 2

Why does Reagan’s videotaped deposition make his involvement in the Iran-Contra Affair uncertain?

Revolt · Accepted Answer

He was unable to recall details.

Question 3

How does the New York Times article support the evidence presented in "The Iran-Contra Affair”?

Revolt · Accepted Answer

by showing that North had a central role

Question 4

Which part of the Tower Commission’s account makes Reagan’s innocence uncertain?

Revolt · Accepted Answer

its claim that Reagan’s disengagement had “created conditions”

Question 5

Why does Olson’s defense of Reagan leave matters uncertain?He discloses information about the trial.He blames Poindexter and North instead.He mentions a few witnesses in the case.He fails to say outright that Reagan lacked knowledge.

Revolt · Accepted Answer

He fails to say outright that Reagan lacked knowledge.

Question 6

How does Olson’s defense of Reagan match the story presented in "The Iran-Contra Affair”?No evidence linking Reagan was found.All White House records were turned over.Two separate investigations were held.There were never any official documents.

Revolt · Accepted Answer

No evidence linking Reagan was found.

The Reagan Revolution Answers

More from this Course

TRY EDGENUITY HACKS