Comparing Arguments from Diverse Perspectives

Question 1

What is the author’s purpose? What is the author’s claim?

Revolt · Accepted Answer

to persuade; Selection 1: to persuade; Selection 2: Social media does more good than harm.

Question 2

Question 2

Revolt · Accepted Answer

Social media does more good than harm.

Question 3

What types of evidence does the author present in this passage? Select three options.

Revolt · Accepted Answer

anecdotal evidence in the form of a personal story about finding a job; empirical evidence from two scientific studies; anecdotal evidence about schools starting social media programs

Question 4

Which statement is insufficient evidence to support the claim that social media helps teens who are shy connect with other people?

Revolt · Accepted Answer

Shy adults are comfortable on social media.

Question 5

Which piece of evidence would better support the claim?

Revolt · Accepted Answer

Sixty percent of users report making new friends through social media.

Question 6

What is an example of fallacious reasoning in the passage? What type of fallacy does the author use?

Revolt · Accepted Answer

Selection 1: The author calls the opposition idiots.; Selection 2: ad hominem

Question 7

Which statement best explains why this is an example of fallacious reasoning?

Revolt · Accepted Answer

The author fails to recognize other behaviors that cause distracted driving.

Question 8

What type of fallacy does the author use?

Revolt · Accepted Answer

false dilemma

Question 9

How does the author of passage 1 use rhetorical devices?

Revolt · Accepted Answer

The writer uses a rhetorical question to introduce the positive effects of social media.

Question 10

How does the author of passage 2 use rhetorical devices?

Revolt · Accepted Answer

The writer uses parallelism to list the harm done by social media.

Comparing Arguments from Diverse Perspectives Answers

More from this Course

TRY EDGENUITY HACKS