1
AssignmentMultiple Choice

Case Study: The Stolen Valor Act

Question 1 • U.S. Government - SS3315 IC

What was the Supreme Court’s ruling in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan?

Answer
A
False speech is unacceptable in every circumstance.
B
False speech is never harmful to listeners.
C
False speech cannot be constitutionally protected.
D
False speech can be allowed if it is not intentionally malicious.

Explanation

In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court ruled that a public official suing over a false statement about official conduct must prove “actual malice”: that the publisher knew the statement was false or recklessly disregarded whether it was true. This protects some false speech from liability when it was not knowingly or recklessly published, making D the best answer. The ruling does not say false speech is always harmless or never protected.

AI-written and checked against the verified answer.

Next