Which claim would most likely be considered valid?

A wildlife biologist has relevant expertise to make a claim about birds and their habitats, so the statement about human expansion destroying migration lands is most likely valid. The company in A may have a financial interest in promoting its product, and the doctor in C explicitly has a conflict of interest. The newspaper in D reflects the editor’s opinions, which does not by itself establish that its claims are valid.

AI-written and checked against the verified answer.