AnswersFall 24 World History A ICImpact of the Crusades

Impact of the Crusades Answers

12 verified answers1 views
1
Free Preview

Background information: Fulcher’s account continues, describing what happened when the crusaders entered the city.How were the Muslim defenders treated by the crusaders after the city fell?

A
Most were allowed to flee the city.
B
Most were taken prisoner.
C
Most were killed, including women and children.
D
Most men were killed, but women and children were spared.
4433

Background information: This account of the fall of Jerusalem in 1099 was written in 1231 by a Muslim historian who traveled with Saladin's army.

Answers:
The author of this account is a .:Muslim defender
As a result, his account is likely to be towards the Muslims who lost their lives.:more sympathetic
His account is likely , because he was not a witness to the event.:less reliable
4885

✔ more sympatheticless sympatheticneutral

A
✔ more sympathetic
B
less sympathetic
C
neutral
5138

His account is likely [___], because he was a witness to the event.

A
more reliable
B
less reliable
C
completely accurate
5139

more reliable✔ less reliablecompletely inaccurate

A
more reliable
B
✔ less reliable
C
completely inaccurate
5140

This writer shows little sympathy towards the Muslims who were killed at Jerusalem.Which statement from the text best supports this claim?

A
Many fled to the roof of the Temple of Solomon.
B
Almost ten thousand were killed.
C
They joyfully killed their nefarious enemies.
D
Some Saracens, Arabs, and Ethiopians took refuge in the Tower of David.
5141

Background information: Ibn al-Athir’s account continues, describing the effects of the crusader’s success in capturing the city.Which of the following does al-Athir discuss in his account?

A
He states that women and children were killed.
B
He states that most men were allowed to flee.
C
He describes the pillaging of the Dome of the Rock.
D
He explains how the Muslims successfully fought off the crusaders.
5142

What events do both of these accounts describe? Check all that apply.

A
the defenders who took refuge in the Tower of David.
B
the execution of women and children
C
the length of time of the battle
D
the pillaging at the Dome of the Rock
E
the conflict at the Temple of Solomon
5143

In one paragraph, compare and contrast the similarities and differences found in the two accounts, and explain which account is more reliable.Use reasons and evidence from the readings to support your claim.

Answer:

Both accounts describe the Franks killing many people in Jerusalem and fighting around the Tower of David and the Temple of Solomon. They differ in their details: Ibn al-Athir says a group at the Tower surrendered and was allowed to leave, while Fulcher says no one was spared. Their estimates of deaths at the Temple also conflict—more than 70,000 in Ibn al-Athir’s account and almost 10,000 in Fulcher’s. Ibn al-Athir’s account seems more reliable because it distinguishes between those killed and the group whose surrender was honored, while Fulcher uses sweeping claims and vivid language. However, Ibn al-Athir’s very large death estimate also means neither account should be accepted uncritically.

5144

Background information: This account of the fall of Jerusalem in 1099 was written in 1231 by a Muslim historian who traveled with Saladin's army.

Answers:
The author of this account is a .:Muslim defender
As a result, his account is likely to be towards the Muslims who lost their lives.:more sympathetic
His account is likely , because he was not a witness to the event.:less reliable

Did you find these answers helpful?