Which two arguments did the Supreme Court use to uphold the constitutionality of Korematsu’s internment?

The Court upheld the exclusion order by deferring to the military’s judgment during wartime. It accepted that there was not enough time to hold individual trials or hearings before removal and that the military had a legitimate need to guard against espionage and sabotage. Korematsu was not proven to be a spy, so choice C is not one of the Court’s arguments.

AI-written and checked against the verified answer.