In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), why did Ernesto Miranda say his Fifth Amendment rights had been violated?

Ernesto Miranda argued that his confession was obtained without first telling him he could remain silent and that his statements could be used against him. The Fifth Amendment protects people from being compelled to incriminate themselves, so the Supreme Court required police to give warnings about those rights before custodial questioning. Choice B describes that issue.

AI-written and checked against the verified answer.