Though the outcomes of Tinker and Schenck differed, which best describes what these court decisions have in common?

Both decisions recognized that freedom of speech is not unlimited. Schenck allowed speech to be restricted when it created a clear and present danger, while Tinker allowed restrictions on student expression that substantially disrupted school. Thus, both accepted limits to protect safety or order; they did not say that all political or symbolic speech could be restricted.

AI-written and checked against the verified answer.