The Struggle for North America Answers

9 verified answers3 views
2
Free Preview

Which of these ideas did you include in your response? Select all that apply.

A
Whether the two sources agree with one another or contradict one another
B
Whether each source is reliable
C
That Washington’s account has more details
D
That both sources discuss the fact that British troops panicked
3

Write two-three sentences explaining whether this document could be used to support Washington’s account.

Answer:

Yes. This eyewitness account supports Washington’s account by describing French, Indigenous, and Canadian forces attacking the British near a fort. It may not confirm every detail, but it provides evidence from another perspective.

4

According to this account, what started the panic among the British soldiers??

A
They were fired on by the French and Indigenous people.
B
The got lost on the way to the hill.
C
The French and Indigenous people looted their supplies.
D
They ran out of food and ammunition.
5

Which of these limitations of a first-person account are found in this account of the battle? Select all that apply.

A
clear bias against the officers
B
inability to see the larger picture because of one’s own experience
C
inability to understand motivations because one was not there
D
lack of access to some information
8

How is Washington's account similar to the newspaper account?

A
Both accounts describe the hilly terrain.
B
Both accounts describe how the British soldiers panicked.
C
Both accounts describe the French and Indigenous people’s battle formation.
D
Both accounts describe how many soldiers were on each side.
9

How does Washington’s account differ from the newspaper account?

A
Washington explains how the battle began.
B
Washington identifies who attacked the British forces.
C
Washington estimates the number of soldiers on each side.
D
Washington mentions that the officers tried to restore order to the British forces.

Did you find these answers helpful?