AnswersHVA 26-27 IM Contemporary World Problems AThe Supreme Court and the Schools

The Supreme Court and the Schools Answers

6 verified answers1 views
1
Free Preview

Why did the Court decide the search of the student’s purse did not violate the Fourth Amendment?

A
The search was reasonable.
B
Students do not enjoy Fourth Amendment rights.
C
School officials may search anyone at any time.
2
Free Preview

What does the Fourth Amendment protect against?

A
unreasonable search and seizure
B
constraints on free speech
C
the establishment of an official religion
3

Which of these statements best summarizes the Court’s ruling in Vernonia v. Acton?

A
Students are protected by the Fourth Amendment, but not as much as adults.
B
Students cannot be required to take drug tests.
C
The Fourth Amendment does not apply to searches like drug tests.
4

Given what you know about the Fourth Amendment, how might the student in this case have best presented his argument?

A
There is no way a drug test could ever be reasonable.
B
The drug test was random, and so there was no good reason to believe he had done drugs.
C
He had special status as an athlete and therefore should be exempted from the search.
5

Which of these statements best describes the Court’s two-part decision in this case?

A
Schools could not use racial quotas, but they could still consider the race of applicants.
B
Schools were told to focus on income instead of race when admitting students.
C
Racial quotas were allowed, so long as they had an equal number for each race.
6

How did Bakke object to the racial quotas used by the University of California?

A
He claimed his racial privacy rights had been deprived.
B
He argued racial quotas were a form of reverse discrimination.
C
He disputed whether affirmative action could really help minorities gain equal status.

Did you find these answers helpful?

The Supreme Court and the Schools Answers — HVA…