The Supreme Court’s decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that the police

Terry v. Ohio allowed police to briefly stop and frisk a person when they have reasonable suspicion that crime is occurring and that the person may be armed. Horton v. California recognized the plain-view doctrine, which can allow police to seize evidence without a warrant when its evidentiary nature is immediately apparent and they are lawfully present. Together, these cases show that police may sometimes search or seize property without a warrant, so A is correct.

AI-written and checked against the verified answer.