AnswersFL-8827110-Marketing Essentials AGlobal Trade

Business Law Answers

7 verified answers3 views
1
Free Preview

Which area of intellectual property law did this case address?

A
copyright
B
trademark
C
trade secrets
D
right of publicity
2
Free Preview

What role did designer Carter Bryant play in this intellectual property case?

A
MGA Entertainment claimed that his design for Mattel was hurting their profits.
B
Mattel claimed that he created the design under dispute while working for them.
C
Mattel claimed that he stole his design from one of the employees at their company.
D
MGA Entertainment claimed that his design was too close to one created by Mattel.
3

Based on this case, why is it necessary to have laws related to sharing confidential information?

A
to prevent businesses from manufacturing competing products
B
to prevent businesses from filing frivolous, time-wasting lawsuits
C
to prevent businesses from using ideas generated at another company
D
to prevent businesses from hiring employees from other companies
4

What decision did a London court reach in this case?

A
The writing of The Da Vinci Code did not violate copyright law.
B
The writing of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail did not violate copyright law.
C
Brown should have asked permission from Baigent and Leigh to use their ideas.
D
Baigent and Leigh should have asked permission from Brown to use his ideas.
5

What reason did the London court provide for its decision?

A
Historical research is fair game for fiction authors to use in their work.
B
Historical research can only be used with the original author’s permission.
C
Historical research is fair to use in nonfiction, but not in works of fiction.
D
Historical research is copyright protected and can never be shared or borrowed.
6

What stipulation on the use of Star Wars did the federal district court include in its ruling?

A
The interest groups could only use the phrase in TV commercials.
B
The interest groups could not use the phrase without permission.
C
The interest groups could only use the phrase for nonprofit purposes.
D
The interest groups could not use the phrase in relation to the film series.
7

Why is this case an example of trademark violation?

A
Payless made sneakers with a pattern that is similar to the Adidas logo.
B
Payless hired a designer from Adidas to create sneakers for them.
C
Payless used the Adidas logo in its TV commercials and print ads.
D
Payless made running shoes based on the style and design of an Adidas sneaker.

Did you find these answers helpful?

More from this Course

Quiz
10 verified answers

Study Guide and Quiz

Quiz
10 verified answers

Study Guide and Quiz

Quiz
10 verified answers

Study Guide and Quiz

Business Law Answers — FL-8827110-Marketing…